
photo - indosurflife.com
Antigua
St John's - Antigua and Barbuda will again be voting in favor of what
has become known as the most controversial form of slaughter and animal
cruelty of the century – whaling.
Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer has signaled his administration’s
intention to again support Japan’s bid to continue the killing of
cetaceans as part of its approach to marine preservation.
And according to reports from the online medium
‘Examiner’, Antigua & Barbuda may have been a part of an alleged
bribery operation undertaken by the Japanese government to gain the
support of small nations that find it rewarding to favor of Japanese
whaling.
“The Japanese government is allegedly bribing small
countries like the Solomon Islands and Antigua & Barbuda to vote
against the proposal,” says an article by Phil Kline, Greenpeace Oceans
Campaigner.
To counter the alleged bribery, Greenpeace had begun
an email fundraising drive of its own within the International Whaling
Commission (IWC).
The group accuses Japan of bribing small
countries to vote against the interests of the
whales and against their
vision of the broader environmental benefits of whale protection.
Prime
Minister Spencer has reportedly said that the move to support Japan is
part of his government’s belief that such action does not affect marine
life and is subject to change based on the government’s perception of
its impact on marine activity.
His comments come as yet another
slap in the face for sister OECS nation Dominica, which markets its
tourism product on the shoulders of
whale watching and natural
preservation.
Local environmentalist Eli Fuller says Antigua is
supporting the move because it is being allegedly bribed to do so; plain
and simple. He told Caribarena that the country has no business
supporting Japan to kill whales, since the country is not given any
assistance to protect any marine life in any way, especially by Japan.
Fuller
noted that when he heard that the minister responsible for marine
resources talking about “sustainable use” and saying that whaling is
“sustainable use”, his reaction was: “They were given blood money. There
is zero evidence of any initiative for sustainable use of our marine
resources. It’s very hypocritical for them to be talking about
sustainable use when none of the money given from Japan is put towards
sustaining our marine resources,” he said.
Over the years, there
have been several attempts by conservationists locally to persuade the
government to vote differently, but these have all gone unheeded.
Fuller
suggested that if the government is so bent on taking the Japanese
money, it should at least use it to build the local fisheries industry
and allow the Japanese government to assist in the supply of the
relevant resources to help manage the industry.
According to the
Antigua and Barbuda Independent Tourism Promotion Corporation’s Martha
Gilkes, her organization has taken a formal stance against whaling for
years and continues to do so today.
“ABITPC still takes a stance that Antigua should not be
voting pro-whaling for a number of reasons including that it is very bad
for tourism,” Gilkes said, adding that several anti-Antigua forums were
found online because of the nation’s stance.
She too, questioned the use of the Japanese funding received over the years for fisheries enhancement.
Tags: